<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toyota Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theallegator.com/free-market/toyota-republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theallegator.com/free-market/toyota-republicans/</link>
	<description>&#34;I do not deny the allegation, I deny the allegator.&#34; – Jesse Jackson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Paleo Conservatist</title>
		<link>http://www.theallegator.com/free-market/toyota-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>The Paleo Conservatist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theallegator.com/?p=96#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Steve, your assertion that &quot;The fact is that foreign businesses invest in manufacturing in the U.S. as much as U.S. companies invest outside of the U.S.&quot; is patently false as our trade imbalance demonstrates by definition.

The facts are that the United States has posted a trade deficit since the late 1960s (and trade deficits in the late 1960s forced the US off the so-called gold standard in 1971), and it has been rapidly increasing since 1997. The US trade deficit hit a record high of 817.3 billion dollars in 2006.

Now yes it&#039;s come down some since then due to our devaluing dollar and lowering energy prices; however, at -614.703 billion we are far from having any kind of a favorable balance.

By the way, if done correctly controlled currency devaluation can help a troubled nation reduce their debt and stimulate an economy (makes a country&#039;s exports relatively less expensive for foreigners and makes foreign products relatively more expensive for domestic consumers, discouraging imports) actually reducing a country&#039;s trade deficit as we have seen recently (assuming manufacturing is occurring materially in the domestic country to fill the gap of reducing imports).

However, it has a dark downside which includes reducing the value of savings, lowering living standards for those on a fixed incomes (about 1 in 4 Americans are seniors or boomers entering seniorhood, the disabled, etc...), etc... and swift currency devaluation leads to economic crisis. 

Better than seeking to devalue our currency is returning to an economic paradigm which yields the desirable results without the downside. EOM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, your assertion that &#8220;The fact is that foreign businesses invest in manufacturing in the U.S. as much as U.S. companies invest outside of the U.S.&#8221; is patently false as our trade imbalance demonstrates by definition.</p>
<p>The facts are that the United States has posted a trade deficit since the late 1960s (and trade deficits in the late 1960s forced the US off the so-called gold standard in 1971), and it has been rapidly increasing since 1997. The US trade deficit hit a record high of 817.3 billion dollars in 2006.</p>
<p>Now yes it&#8217;s come down some since then due to our devaluing dollar and lowering energy prices; however, at -614.703 billion we are far from having any kind of a favorable balance.</p>
<p>By the way, if done correctly controlled currency devaluation can help a troubled nation reduce their debt and stimulate an economy (makes a country&#8217;s exports relatively less expensive for foreigners and makes foreign products relatively more expensive for domestic consumers, discouraging imports) actually reducing a country&#8217;s trade deficit as we have seen recently (assuming manufacturing is occurring materially in the domestic country to fill the gap of reducing imports).</p>
<p>However, it has a dark downside which includes reducing the value of savings, lowering living standards for those on a fixed incomes (about 1 in 4 Americans are seniors or boomers entering seniorhood, the disabled, etc&#8230;), etc&#8230; and swift currency devaluation leads to economic crisis. </p>
<p>Better than seeking to devalue our currency is returning to an economic paradigm which yields the desirable results without the downside. EOM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ◄Dave►</title>
		<link>http://www.theallegator.com/free-market/toyota-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>◄Dave►</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theallegator.com/?p=96#comment-228</guid>
		<description>I just got back here through your funnel site. Pretty slick! ◄Dave►</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got back here through your funnel site. Pretty slick! ◄Dave►</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steel Phoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.theallegator.com/free-market/toyota-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Steel Phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theallegator.com/?p=96#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m really impressed that so far our entire debt is in dollars (suckers). We have to keep an eye on that though. Those pork pushers in Washington will be looking for collateral now that foreign nations are cutting up their credit cards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m really impressed that so far our entire debt is in dollars (suckers). We have to keep an eye on that though. Those pork pushers in Washington will be looking for collateral now that foreign nations are cutting up their credit cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ◄Dave►</title>
		<link>http://www.theallegator.com/free-market/toyota-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>◄Dave►</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theallegator.com/?p=96#comment-226</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know... there are industrious little beavers all over the world producing and shipping pretty neat toys to us, and all we offer them in return is worthless little pieces of green paper... and they are TAKING them... shhhh, don&#039;t mess up a good thing!

Seriously, look at our trade deficit. What else are they supposed to do with these green IOUs, besides bring them back over here to invest them? ◄Dave►</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230; there are industrious little beavers all over the world producing and shipping pretty neat toys to us, and all we offer them in return is worthless little pieces of green paper&#8230; and they are TAKING them&#8230; shhhh, don&#8217;t mess up a good thing!</p>
<p>Seriously, look at our trade deficit. What else are they supposed to do with these green IOUs, besides bring them back over here to invest them? ◄Dave►</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steel Phoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.theallegator.com/free-market/toyota-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Steel Phoenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 06:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theallegator.com/?p=96#comment-224</guid>
		<description>From my first paragraph: &quot;These foreign plants on U.S. soil aren’t entirely a bad thing, although they are still sending our money overseas.&quot;

Am I missing a side of the coin?

I&#039;m not sure what your point is. Most of the post is about foreign manufacturing in the US, and I listed the job creation.

To summarize my points:
Under NAFTA, manufactuuring and agriculture find advantage in moving to Mexico. This includes companies like Toyota.
I would be sorry to see them move to Mexico.
I would much rather see our own auto manufacturers thrive than Toyota, but they need heavy restructuring to be competitive, not subsidizing by bailout or tariff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my first paragraph: &#8220;These foreign plants on U.S. soil aren’t entirely a bad thing, although they are still sending our money overseas.&#8221;</p>
<p>Am I missing a side of the coin?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what your point is. Most of the post is about foreign manufacturing in the US, and I listed the job creation.</p>
<p>To summarize my points:<br />
Under NAFTA, manufactuuring and agriculture find advantage in moving to Mexico. This includes companies like Toyota.<br />
I would be sorry to see them move to Mexico.<br />
I would much rather see our own auto manufacturers thrive than Toyota, but they need heavy restructuring to be competitive, not subsidizing by bailout or tariff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.theallegator.com/free-market/toyota-republicans/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theallegator.com/?p=96#comment-222</guid>
		<description>It iis absolutely amazing how few people recognize that coins have two sides. 

Recently:

1 Brazilian manufacturing in the U.S.:  Earlier in the month, Embraer broke ground on a plant to produce business jets in Melbourne, Florida.  The factory will be approximately 150,000 square feet and will employ more than 200,.

2.  Italian manufacturing in U.S.:  In November, Brevini Spa, an Italian company, announced that it will invest $50 million in the U.S. and employee 500 in Indiana to manufacture  gearboxes for wind turbines.

3.  Solon AG, German, invested $30 million earlier in the year at its Global Solar Plant in Tucson.  This will employ 250 people.

The fact is that foreign businesses invest in manufacturing in the U.S. as much as U.S. companies invest outside of the U.S. 

Put on your glasses and take a look at both sides of the coin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It iis absolutely amazing how few people recognize that coins have two sides. </p>
<p>Recently:</p>
<p>1 Brazilian manufacturing in the U.S.:  Earlier in the month, Embraer broke ground on a plant to produce business jets in Melbourne, Florida.  The factory will be approximately 150,000 square feet and will employ more than 200,.</p>
<p>2.  Italian manufacturing in U.S.:  In November, Brevini Spa, an Italian company, announced that it will invest $50 million in the U.S. and employee 500 in Indiana to manufacture  gearboxes for wind turbines.</p>
<p>3.  Solon AG, German, invested $30 million earlier in the year at its Global Solar Plant in Tucson.  This will employ 250 people.</p>
<p>The fact is that foreign businesses invest in manufacturing in the U.S. as much as U.S. companies invest outside of the U.S. </p>
<p>Put on your glasses and take a look at both sides of the coin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

